No Jobs, No Obama Birth Certificate, No NBC: Morning Intell

Morning Intell

Morning Intell: Weekday Edition:
Friday – December 4, 2009


Yesterday’s Morning INTELL: Tiger Woods Confesses, Failing Rhetoric, NASA Fraud: Morning Intell


EXTRA: Palin: Obama’s birth certificate is fair game; Update: Transcript added
DBKP will have a story on this later on Friday. Check back.


TOP STORIES at: DBKP FLASH Headline News:

YOU WILL BLOW YOUR TOP: Somebody at Fort Hood Should Be Walking the Plank


CLIMATEGATE-APALOOZA!

JAY LENO: “In more serious news, President Obama last night ordered 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan, to fight the Taliban, but on an 18-month timetable. In a related story, the Taliban announced they’re on a 19-month timetable.”


Obama calls for new ideas for creating jobs
None of the “new ideas” included the government getting the hell out of the way and leaving people alone.
JOHN STOSSEL KNOWS: Who Creates Jobs?
For sure it isn’t government. Well, you know, other than government parasite jobs…


HOW MANY CAN YOU SPELL? 100 Most Often Mispelled Misspelled Words in English


NEW BLOG NEWS AGGREGATOR: Blogs Lucianne Love
Lucianne Goldberg–she of Monica Lewinsky fame, Lucianne.com and mother of National Review’s Jonah Goldberg–has started another site, this time for blogs. Here’s her reasoning:

Late Breaking News! Here it is, the “Lucianne.com for Blogs!”

Why a site for blogs?

After a decade of aggregating the Mainstream Media we realize that the cutting edge of information is on the blogs of the Internet. If you don’t read them, you are operating with half your brain tied behind your back
(humm, where have we heard that?)

The hard news and dogged investigative journalism are increasingly found on blogs, we felt there should be a handy way to find them. Thus, we created this site. The blogs you will read here are posted by invitation only. However, the threads are open for comments from registered members of Lucianne.com.

Welcome to a brave new world of truth and information.

AND…DBKP is one of the invitees! So it’s a win-win…as far as we’re concerned, that is…


DOUBLE TROUBLE: Yahoo, Verizon: Our Spy Capabilities Would ‘Shock’, ‘Confuse’ Consumers
How many times does the government surf your computer? More than you are aware of..
Sprint fed customer GPS data to cops over 8 million times
When the capability is there, someone in government and law enforcement is going to use it..


THE PLOT THICKENS: Tiger Woods Scandal: Rachel Uchitel Received $1 Mil to CAncel Press Conference, According to Sources


CONAN O’BRIEN: ““Time” magazine plans to announce its Person of the Year next week and top contenders include President Obama and Steve Jobs. The other top contender: The one guy who still reads “Time” Magazine.”


DBKP Report


DBKP Morning Intell


TV GATE CRASHERS: Real Housewives of D.C.: Bravo TV’s Casting Calls Controversy, Will Salahis Wind up on Cutting Room Floor?


IN CASE YOU WERE INTERESTED: Natalie Portman’s Ten Best Movies


SIGH: NBC Name on the Chopping Block?
Maybe…
One reason may be that NBC is currently, according to Media Research Center, in the midst of Day 12 of not mentioning ClimateGate.


NBC’s TAKE on CLIMATE CHANGE AFTER CLIMATEGATE:


Fragile Freedom
WHAT would Ronald Reagan think now?


JAY LENO: “This Tiger Woods thing is having an effect on a lot of people. In fact, earlier today, Elizabeth Edwards went out and bought a new set of golf clubs. I didn’t even know that she played.”


DBKP Report


Rasmussen: Almost Two-Thirds Oppose Single Payer System


VIDEO of the DAY: Tickle the Kitten

Hard not to say, “cute”–even for a cigar-smoking, hard-case like this writer…


DAILY HAH! Obamacare: You’ve Waited This Long, So What’s Another Century?


by Mondo Frazier

images: DBKP file

One response to “No Jobs, No Obama Birth Certificate, No NBC: Morning Intell

  1. “Climategate” started out when there appeared on the Internet a collection of e-mails of a group of climatologists who work in the University of East Anglia in England. These documents reveal that some climatologists of international preeminence have manipulated the data of their investigations and have strongly tried to discredit climatologists who are not convinced that the increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are the cause of global warming.

    It is true that a majority of the scientists who study climatic tendencies in our atmosphere have arrived at the conclusion that the world’s climate is changing, and they have convinced a group of politicians, some of whom are politically powerful, of the truth of their conclusions.

    A minority, however, is skeptical. Some believe that recent data that suggest that the average temperature of the atmosphere is going up can be explained by natural variations in solar radiation and that global warming is a temporary phenomenon. Others believe that the historical evidence indicating that the temperature of the atmosphere is going up at a dangerous rate is simply not reliable.

    Such lacks of agreement are common in the sciences. They are reduced and eventually eliminated with the accumulation of new evidence and of more refined theories or even by completely new ones. Such debates can persist for a period of decades. Academics often throw invective at one another in these debates. But typically this does not mean much.

    But the case of climate change is different. If the evidence indicates that global warming is progressive, is caused principally by our industrial processes, and will probably cause disastrous changes in our atmosphere before the end of the twenty-first century, then we do not have the time to verify precisely if this evidence is reliable. Such a process would be a question of many years of new investigations. And if the alarmist climatologists are right, such a delay would be tragic for all humanity.

    The difficulty is that economic and climatologic systems are very complicated. They are not like celestial mechanics, which involves only the interaction of gravity and centrifugal force, and efforts to construct computerized models to describe these complicated systems simply cannot include all the factors that are influential in the evolution of these complicated systems.

    All this does not necessarily indicate that the alarmist climatologists are not right. But it really means that if global warming is occurring, we cannot know exactly what will be the average temperature of our atmosphere in the year 2100 and what will be the average sea level of the world’s ocean in that year.

    It also means that we cannot be confident that efforts by the industrialized countries to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere will have a significant influence on the evolution of the world’s climate.

    Alas, the reduction of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere would be very costly and would greatly change the lives of all the inhabitants of our planet–with the possibility (perhaps even the probability!) that all these efforts will be completely useless.

    Harleigh Kyson Jr.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s