Federal Judge Refuses to Dismiss Birther Case

Gavel

OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE CASE GOES FORWARD–FOR NOW

Will those who challenge the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president finally get their day in court–to argue the case on its merits?

It’s looking more likely.

From Obama eligibility case survives 1st court test:

A federal judge in California today listened to government lawyers argue that a lawsuit over President Obama’s eligibility should be immediately dismissed but refused to grant their request, saying he would make his decision and announce it later.

The result came this morning from U.S. District Judge David Carter, who already has set a tentative trial date for the dispute Jan. 26, 2010. The judge also already had lawyers draw up a tentative schedule for hearings and deadlines in preparation for the trial.

Apparently, the strategy employed thus far by Obama’s lawyers and his allies in the Legacy Media didn’t work in Judge Carter’s courtroom. That would be to call the opposition “birthers” and argue that no one in the USA has standing to challenge the eligibility of Barack Obama–in lieu of simply presenting an Obama long form birth certificate.

So far, Obama’s lawyers have been successful in arguing in other cases that no one in the USA has “standing” to sue over Obama’s questions of eligibility.

Should the lawsuit proceed, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been heard in open court.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen.” The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

Why has Obama’s legal team spent so much money–in excess of $1 million and counting–to fight against producing a document that the average America has to pony up to get their driver’s license?

Continue reading: Obama Birth Cerificate: Federal Judge Refuses to Dismiss Birther Case

by Mondo Frazier

3 responses to “Federal Judge Refuses to Dismiss Birther Case

  1. Judge Land and now judge Carter, smack down the crazies (case dismissed), poor little Birthers.

    Not even “Fake News” Bill O’Reilly believes the crazies, how funny.

    http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/29/bill-oreilly-slams-orly-taitz/
    http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHER%20CASE%20LIST.pdf

    To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true (TOUGH WHEN YOU KEEP LOSING CASES), if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it.

    In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”.

    I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Stanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC). She wants to re-establish a family values party.

    I can only hope that Taitz will resist the state collectors that will be coming to collect the $20K.

  2. It seems the only time Politicians use the Constitution is if it is for thier gain or if they are attempting to take something away from the American public such as the 2nd Amendment. Why are they above the law and with us it is strictly enforced. A friend of mine could not get a Missouri State I.D. card unless he went and got a copy of his birth record. Why should a person running for President be any different. The law is the law,which, be the way these people put them there and they keep adding laws daily to force use to do the right thing. I wonder, who, is footing the bills in the defense of President Obama. I think we all know the answer to that.

  3. Preston,

    I took your comment out of SPAM.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s